your image

Stora Enso: Human Rights Commitment through Prioritization| Case Studies | BSR

Stora Enso team
bsr.org
Related Topic
:- good human relationship

 

CASE STUDIES

Stora Enso: Human Rights Commitment through Prioritization

 

 

For four years, BSR has worked with Stora Enso, a leading forest products company based in Finland, to support the company’s human rights journey. Stora Enso is one of the first companies globally to systematically track its human rights impacts and publish the findings.

The Challenge

Stora Enso initiated a company-wide human rights impact assessment (HRIA) in 2013. It was accelerated by a challenging situation in Pakistan the following year, when child labor was discovered deep in the local supply chain of a company in which Stora Enso held a minority stake. The goal of the HRIA, conducted together with the Danish Institute for Human Rights, was to gain a holistic view of Stora Enso’s potential human rights impacts in all of its 92 business units worldwide. Based on the findings, the company developed a global human rights action plan (HRAP) that features hundreds of action points.

Upon completing the HRAP, which included a collaboration with BSR to implement a local HRAP in China from 2015-2017, Stora Enso partnered with BSR to identify the company’s highest priority human rights issues. The goal was to find those human rights issues that Stora Enso has the most impact on and should therefore focus on when planning its work and allocating resources.

Our Strategy

Identifying Stora Enso’s human rights priorities was a unique project in how it was structured. As the company has transformed from a traditional paper company into a renewable materials company, its human rights profile has changed. A successful project required commitment from all business units and supporting functions; the project also had to reflect the real-world business challenges the organization was facing.

With frequent one-on-one engagement with the project steering group and function heads, BSR and Stora Enso mapped the company’s existing human rights systems and gaps in its processes. This diverse working group identified eight human rights priorities, which were then discussed and approved by Stora Enso’s executive team, making the bigger plan a company-wide effort.

Our Outcomes and Impact

Over the past four years, BSR’s support has helped Stora Enso to identify its highest priority human rights impacts and to develop a plan for addressing them. The eight highest-priority human rights will guide Stora Enso’s future work, which will include an updated due diligence and monitoring program.

Case studies on Stora Enso’s work have been shared within the BSR Human Rights Working Group as topics for discussion and learning, which has directly impacted the group’s member companies and, more widely, the global human rights field.

Lessons Learned

Companies about to undertake the development of a comprehensive human rights program may want to consider these suggestions.

  • Remember that it’s not only about scale: Normal risk thresholds may not work when it comes to human rights. Stora Enso was first exposed to serious human rights issues in the supply chain of a minority investment company in an emerging market. The subsequent publicity impacted the company’s reputation heavily for more than two years. 
  • Gain internal buy-in: Involve all relevant business functions when developing your human rights program. True commitment and willingness to act come from inclusion in the process.
  • Ensure practicality: For human rights recommendations to turn into action, they need to be pragmatic. Introduce plans that are realistic to implement, measure, and assess.
  • Get top management sign-off: Having top management approval demonstrates that human rights are important to the company. Involve leaders at an early stage.

#Human Rights, #Supply Chain

 

 

YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

 

REPORTS

The Business Role in Creating a 21st-Century Social Contract

The time is now for an overhaul of the social contract to address 21st-century realities and needs. A new social contract can deliver long-term value creation that enables economic security and mobility, is genuinely inclusive, and addresses challenges such as the transition to clean energy and the emergence of a digital world.

Read More  

 

REPORTS

Access to Remedy

After 10 years of implementing the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs), companies are increasingly expected to address the harms they have caused or contributed to through their business relationships. This brief explains what effective remedy is, the role of business, and five recommendations for companies to improve access.

Read More  

 

BLOG

Creating Opportunities for Action: Advancing Children’s Rights in the Palm Oil Industry

The number of children in child labor has increased from 152 to 160 million globally, and COVID-19 is expected to further obstruct efforts to eliminate child labor. Here's how palm oil companies can respect child rights and address this complex issue.

Read More  

 

REPORTS

Addressing Forced Labor and other Modern Slavery Risks: A Toolkit for Corporate Suppliers

The Global Business Coalition against Human Trafficking (GBCAT) has released a new toolkit that aims to help businesses that work in corporate supply chains to quickly identify areas of the business which carry the highest risk of modern slavery and develop a plan to identify, prevent, and address risks.

Read More  

 

REPORTS

Human Rights Impact Assessment: Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism

The Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism (GIFCT) commissioned BSR to conduct a human rights assessment of its strategy, governance, and activities.

Read More  

 

BLOG

A Human Rights Assessment of the Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism (GIFCT)

In late 2020, the Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism (GIFCT) commissioned BSR to undertake a human rights assessment of its strategy, governance, and actions. Today, we are publishing the final report.

 

 

REPORTS

Responsible Product Use in the SaaS Sector

According to many ethical and human rights frameworks, software-as-a-service (SaaS) companies have a responsibility to address adverse impacts that may be associated with their business relationships and use of their products and services.

 

 

SIGN ME UP

 
BSR WEB PROPERTIES

 

Comments